<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Page Saver 1.1 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pearlcrescent.com/archives/35/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pearlcrescent.com/archives/35</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pearl Wisdom &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 1.5.0.5 Available</title>
		<link>http://blog.pearlcrescent.com/archives/35#comment-2391</link>
		<dc:creator>Pearl Wisdom &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 1.5.0.5 Available</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pearlcrescent.com/?p=35#comment-2391</guid>
		<description>[...] Pearl Wisdom       &#171; Page Saver 1.1 Released [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pearl Wisdom       &laquo; Page Saver 1.1 Released [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.pearlcrescent.com/archives/35#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pearlcrescent.com/?p=35#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>These are all good suggestions; thanks.  Some people want a minimum wait time as well (some pages use Javascript to add content after the page is done loading).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all good suggestions; thanks.  Some people want a minimum wait time as well (some pages use Javascript to add content after the page is done loading).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thierry Schork</title>
		<link>http://blog.pearlcrescent.com/archives/35#comment-1914</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry Schork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pearlcrescent.com/?p=35#comment-1914</guid>
		<description>The saveas command line switch is good, but another switches that might be useful in my opinion are:

1) Allow us to specify how long we want to wait, and do the capture at this moment, even if the page is not fully loaded. In a scripted environnement (like the one I use page saver), fetching all of the flash video ads to make the screenshot is not always a positive functionnality.

2) Allow to specify a "onlyVisibleArea". Whan a page is, for exemple, 2000 pixels in height, it's not alway something useful to have the full height of the page in the screenshot.

And that leads me for my last comment:
3) please, allow us to save a mandatory image size, cropping the screeshot rather than resizing it... I dont want a 800x2000 px image resized to {peanuts}x600 pixels. 

I know that it's not that simple. I've tried for some times to do it in a reliable way using standard *nix tools, but that would be the ultimate functionnality I'd need, and I'd be ready to pay even more than 15$ for it.

You'll get a fairly precise image of what I search to achieve here:
http://webalis.com/img/pearl.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The saveas command line switch is good, but another switches that might be useful in my opinion are:</p>
<p>1) Allow us to specify how long we want to wait, and do the capture at this moment, even if the page is not fully loaded. In a scripted environnement (like the one I use page saver), fetching all of the flash video ads to make the screenshot is not always a positive functionnality.</p>
<p>2) Allow to specify a &#8220;onlyVisibleArea&#8221;. Whan a page is, for exemple, 2000 pixels in height, it&#8217;s not alway something useful to have the full height of the page in the screenshot.</p>
<p>And that leads me for my last comment:<br />
3) please, allow us to save a mandatory image size, cropping the screeshot rather than resizing it&#8230; I dont want a 800&#215;2000 px image resized to {peanuts}x600 pixels. </p>
<p>I know that it&#8217;s not that simple. I&#8217;ve tried for some times to do it in a reliable way using standard *nix tools, but that would be the ultimate functionnality I&#8217;d need, and I&#8217;d be ready to pay even more than 15$ for it.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll get a fairly precise image of what I search to achieve here:<br />
<a href="http://webalis.com/img/pearl.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://webalis.com/img/pearl.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
